User
NB Posts : 138
Created :
Last visit :
User signature :
VG: PoC: IM:
CS 009: , 123:
VotE SoM
CS 009: , 123:
VotE SoM
Posted
I don’t have the cards in front, but what cardtype does the Abunothus unblock
Posted
So you found the same exploit as me, just the other way around.
Seems like the errata wasn’t good enough a fix 😅 Posted
The English version already contains the correct text
Posted
No initiating has nothing to do with the preparation phase. So A is correct and I think this was pretty clear, as you don’t have a number to read.
Posted
I assume winning a fight means you reach a white box that tells you to return/discard/banish and losing means it’s in a black box.
Posted
TimeLordXT wrote: the green 347 dont have anything say about discard it, but i have a gold card is this a missprinted? There are other ways to get rid of a card. The game will tell you. Sometimes you have gold cards you won’t ever see, as you own an expansion that makes the gold card useless. Posted
It‘s KicKstarter
Posted
Lorkenpeist wrote: I would think a cumbersome item would still make it hard to move even if damaged (e.g., you can't use "On the Double" if you carry an item with CUMBERSOME). So... Maybe it's okay to trade my torn Cape? The rules do explicitly say to interpret them in my favor if it's ambiguous No, blocked cumbersome items don’t count and you can move. Posted
Yes to both
Posted
Karbous wrote: A similar case - as a consequence of an action, you get a card and you loose life (a common consequence in battle compound actions). If that card is for example "Alert", which has a effect, you cannot use that card for blocking you got from this action. This is because the effect is the last thing you do, so the damage is already done. This is different to the effect used here. Posted
I now played the next scenario with my proposed errata and it was way more interesting again, after it became a bit boring with that exploit.
Posted
Maybe it’s because I‘m not a native speaker, but I had read the sentence always the way it was intended.
However I see that consider can also be used in a different way. But as people rightfully say, that writing is confusing and shouldn’t be used. So I don’t understand, why they think it is an error and not that it should be read differently. Posted
Oh missed that.
The numbers are 180 and 468 Posted - Edited
Only works with Arthen, as the other chars only get 1 card back from Inspiration
Inspiration (A) + Speciality (Advanced) I play Inspiration take Speciality (and another card) out of discard pile and then discard Speciality. That way I can play Inspiration as often as I want (as long as Speciality is in the discard) and fill up my hand. With the cards below, I can have -3 cost and 1 success on each action, as I just get them back afterwards. This means I can move for free and do anything up to 3/1 for free. Can this be correct? This is incredibly strong. However the other way to read the card (first discard and then choose 2) would be the same, but you wouldn’t even need specialty for that. Possible Errata: "choose up to 2 cards from your discard pile, discard this, then add them to your hand" Posted
I do it that way too.
Better doing stuff at the end then at the start of the next round. Posted - Moved
sgbeal wrote:
I don’t think this is a typo, as there are horshes and hournds Animals are just named different there. Posted
You are misunderstanding the card.
You are throwing a stone and thus you have selected a card with the keyword PROJECTILE. At least virtually, as they didn’t want to include a card just for that. Posted
1) you often need to discard cards after use.
Here you can discard that one instead of the original card. 2) you choose 3) yes Posted
I don’t like KE stuff too
Especially, as that will never be translated Posted
It‘s one action, that‘s correct.
But you do it multiple times. And each time you go through all the steps. |